|












| |
Pete Bevington
17 April, 2008
THE EUROPEAN Commission yesterday (Wednesday) opened a formal investigation into
the way the Scottish Government subsidises ferry operators NorthLink and CalMac.
The
move comes eight years after the first complaints to the EC, and one month after
SNP MEP Alyn Smith urged the commission to get stuck in.
Yesterday Mr Smith explained he was taking the “unusual step” of calling for his
colleagues to investigated, because he thought it essential for clarity on the
issue to give the ferry services long term stability.
EC vice president Jacques Berrot said they needed to make sure the current
subsidy schemes do not fall foul of state aid rules, and in particular that
there had been no “overcompensation of undue distortion of fair competition”.
Monsieur Barrot said: “I am well aware of the importance of lifeline ferry
services to ensure the survival and prosperity of isolated island communities in
Scotland. This is actually a very important reason why we should ensure full
compatibility with EC law and provide legal certainty for the way these services
are organised.”
The EC has already carried out a preliminary investigation following allegations
that state aid rules had been breached. Yesterday’s decision formally opened the
investigation procedure.
The commission is not questioning the need for regular, affordable lifeline
ferry services to the northern and western isles, and is not threatening to
close them down. It wants to ensure the subsidy schemes to support them are
“proportionate to such public interest objectives”.
The UK government has been given two months to reply to the EC, which will
shortly publish its decision in the EU’s Official Journal for comment by
interested parties.
Yesterday Mr Smith welcomed the decision to investigate “the legacy of
Scotland's ferry policy the SNP government inherited on taking office”.
Mr Smith said: “This will give everyone clarity, a clear timescale and process
to argue this case, and I have no doubt that the SNP will argue this robustly
with a view to obtaining a stable future for Scotland's ferry users and
companies.
“We have nothing to fear from a robust argument in a formal legal setting, and I
have every confidence that these proceedings will remedy the guddle the SNP
government inherited."
The SNP at Holyrood have made it clear they are not happy with the situation
they inherited from the last Labour/LibDem Scottish Executive, particularly on
the Gourock/Dunoon route where a subsidised CalMac service competes against
unsibsidised Western Ferries.
A similar situation pertains on the Pentland Firth with Pentland Ferries argue
they face unfair competition from the subsidised NorthLink ferry Hamnavoe.
Shetland MSP Tavish Scott was the last transport minister before the SNP took
over in Edinburgh last May, and oversaw the re-tendering of the NorthLink
contract.
Yesterday Mr Scott called for the inquiry to be completed quickly. “While they
have to respond to a complaint, I don't believe that such an investigation will
do anything other than confirm that these services are compliant with the
appropriate rules.”
Meanwhile the David MacBrayne Group, which includes both NorthLink and CalMac
Ferries, welcomed the approach being taken by Europe towards the controversy.
Chairman Peter Timms said: "We will be happy to cooperate fully with this
investigation and will help the Scottish Government to provide the commission
with all the information required to meet the aims of the investigation.
"We fully understand the issues involved and that the commission requires more
information to check that the mechanisms used in recent years do not fall foul
of funding rules.
“We also welcome the confirmation that the EU investigators are aware of the
importance of lifeline ferry routes to the many isolated communities in Scotland
that our group companies serve.
“It has always been our first priority to maintain and develop the services to
the communities we serve, and hopefully this investigation will clarify any
outstanding issues which remain about the way these services are funded and how
we operate.”
|